NAG Library Routine Document
E02GCF
1 Purpose
E02GCF calculates an ${l}_{\infty}$ solution to an overdetermined system of linear equations.
2 Specification
SUBROUTINE E02GCF ( 
M, N, SDA, LDA, A, B, TOL, RELERR, X, RESMAX, IRANK, ITER, IFAIL) 
INTEGER 
M, N, SDA, LDA, IRANK, ITER, IFAIL 
REAL (KIND=nag_wp) 
A(LDA,SDA), B(M), TOL, RELERR, X(N), RESMAX 

3 Description
Given a matrix
$A$ with
$m$ rows and
$n$ columns
$\left(m\ge n\right)$ and a vector
$b$ with
$m$ elements, the routine calculates an
${l}_{\infty}$ solution to the overdetermined system of equations
That is to say, it calculates a vector
$x$, with
$n$ elements, which minimizes the
${l}_{\infty}$ norm of the residuals (the absolutely largest residual)
where the residuals
${r}_{i}$ are given by
Here ${a}_{ij}$ is the element in row $i$ and column $j$ of $A$, ${b}_{i}$ is the $i$th element of $b$ and ${x}_{j}$ the $j$th element of $x$. The matrix $A$ need not be of full rank. The solution is not unique in this case, and may not be unique even if $A$ is of full rank.
Alternatively, in applications where a complete minimization of the
${l}_{\infty}$ norm is not necessary, you may obtain an approximate solution, usually in shorter time, by giving an appropriate value to the parameter
RELERR.
Typically in applications to data fitting, data consisting of
$m$ points with coordinates
$\left({t}_{i},{y}_{i}\right)$ is to be approximated in the
${l}_{\infty}$ norm by a linear combination of known functions
${\varphi}_{j}\left(t\right)$,
This is equivalent to finding an
${l}_{\infty}$ solution to the overdetermined system of equations
Thus if, for each value of $i$ and $j$ the element ${a}_{ij}$ of the matrix $A$ above is set equal to the value of ${\varphi}_{j}\left({t}_{i}\right)$ and ${b}_{i}$ is set equal to ${y}_{i}$, the solution vector $x$ will contain the required values of the ${\alpha}_{j}$. Note that the independent variable $t$ above can, instead, be a vector of several independent variables (this includes the case where each ${\varphi}_{i}$ is a function of a different variable, or set of variables).
The algorithm is a modification of the simplex method of linear programming applied to the dual formation of the
${l}_{\infty}$ problem (see
Barrodale and Phillips (1974) and
Barrodale and Phillips (1975)). The modifications are designed to improve the efficiency and stability of the simplex method for this particular application.
4 References
Barrodale I and Phillips C (1974) An improved algorithm for discrete Chebyshev linear approximation Proc. 4th Manitoba Conf. Numerical Mathematics 177–190 University of Manitoba, Canada
Barrodale I and Phillips C (1975) Solution of an overdetermined system of linear equations in the Chebyshev norm [F4] (Algorithm 495) ACM Trans. Math. Software 1(3) 264–270
5 Parameters
 1: M – INTEGERInput
On entry: the number of equations, $m$ (the number of rows of the matrix $A$).
Constraint:
${\mathbf{M}}\ge {\mathbf{N}}$.
 2: N – INTEGERInput
On entry: the number of unknowns, $n$ (the number of columns of the matrix $A$).
Constraint:
${\mathbf{N}}\ge 1$.
 3: SDA – INTEGERInput
On entry: the second dimension of the array
A as declared in the (sub)program from which E02GCF is called.
Constraint:
${\mathbf{SDA}}\ge {\mathbf{M}}+1$.
 4: LDA – INTEGERInput
On entry: the first dimension of the array
A as declared in the (sub)program from which E02GCF is called.
Constraint:
${\mathbf{LDA}}\ge {\mathbf{N}}+3$.
 5: A(LDA,SDA) – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayInput/Output
On entry:
${\mathbf{A}}\left(\mathit{j},\mathit{i}\right)$ must contain
${a}_{\mathit{i}\mathit{j}}$, the element in the
$\mathit{i}$th row and
$\mathit{j}$th column of the matrix
$A$, for
$\mathit{i}=1,2,\dots ,m$ and
$\mathit{j}=1,2,\dots ,n$, (that is, the
transpose of the matrix). The remaining elements need not be set. Preferably, the columns of the matrix
$A$ (rows of the parameter
A) should be scaled before entry: see
Section 7.
On exit: contains the last simplex tableau.
 6: B(M) – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayInput/Output
On entry: ${\mathbf{B}}\left(\mathit{i}\right)$ must contain ${b}_{\mathit{i}}$, the $\mathit{i}$th element of the vector $b$, for $\mathit{i}=1,2,\dots ,m$.
On exit: the
$\mathit{i}$th residual
${\mathit{r}}_{\mathit{i}}$ corresponding to the solution vector
$x$, for
$\mathit{i}=1,2,\dots ,m$. Note however that these residuals may contain few significant figures, especially when
RESMAX is within one or two orders of magnitude of
TOL. Indeed if
${\mathbf{RESMAX}}\le {\mathbf{TOL}}$, the elements
${\mathbf{B}}\left(i\right)$ may all be set to zero. It is therefore often advisable to compute the residuals directly.
 7: TOL – REAL (KIND=nag_wp)Input
On entry: a threshold below which numbers are regarded as zero. The recommended threshold value is
$10.0\times \epsilon $, where
$\epsilon $ is the
machine precision. If
${\mathbf{TOL}}\le 0.0$ on entry, the recommended value is used within the routine. If premature termination occurs, a larger value for
TOL may result in a valid solution.
Suggested value:
$0.0$.
 8: RELERR – REAL (KIND=nag_wp)Input/Output
On entry: must be set to a bound on the relative error acceptable in the maximum residual at the solution.
If
${\mathbf{RELERR}}\le 0.0$, then the
${l}_{\infty}$ solution is computed, and
RELERR is set to
$0.0$ on exit.
If
${\mathbf{RELERR}}>0.0$, then the routine obtains instead an approximate solution for which the largest residual is less than
$1.0+{\mathbf{RELERR}}$ times that of the
${l}_{\infty}$ solution; on exit,
RELERR contains a smaller value such that the above bound still applies. (The usual result of this option, say with
${\mathbf{RELERR}}=0.1$, is a saving in the number of simplex iterations).
On exit: is altered as described above.
 9: X(N) – REAL (KIND=nag_wp) arrayOutput
On exit: if
${\mathbf{IFAIL}}={\mathbf{0}}$ or
${\mathbf{1}}$,
${\mathbf{X}}\left(\mathit{j}\right)$ contains the
$\mathit{j}$th element of the solution vector
$x$, for
$\mathit{j}=1,2,\dots ,n$. Whether this is an
${l}_{\infty}$ solution or an approximation to one, depends on the value of
RELERR on entry.
 10: RESMAX – REAL (KIND=nag_wp)Output
On exit: if
${\mathbf{IFAIL}}={\mathbf{0}}$ or
${\mathbf{1}}$,
RESMAX contains the absolute value of the largest residual(s) for the solution vector
$x$. (See
B.)
 11: IRANK – INTEGEROutput
On exit: if
${\mathbf{IFAIL}}={\mathbf{0}}$ or
${\mathbf{1}}$,
IRANK contains the computed rank of the matrix
$A$.
 12: ITER – INTEGEROutput
On exit: if
${\mathbf{IFAIL}}={\mathbf{0}}$ or
${\mathbf{1}}$,
ITER contains the number of iterations taken by the simplex method.
 13: IFAIL – INTEGERInput/Output

On entry:
IFAIL must be set to
$0$,
$1\text{ or}1$. If you are unfamiliar with this parameter you should refer to
Section 3.3 in the Essential Introduction for details.
For environments where it might be inappropriate to halt program execution when an error is detected, the value
$1\text{ or}1$ is recommended. If the output of error messages is undesirable, then the value
$1$ is recommended. Otherwise, because for this routine the values of the output parameters may be useful even if
${\mathbf{IFAIL}}\ne {\mathbf{0}}$ on exit, the recommended value is
$1$.
When the value $\mathbf{1}\text{ or}1$ is used it is essential to test the value of IFAIL on exit.
On exit:
${\mathbf{IFAIL}}={\mathbf{0}}$ unless the routine detects an error or a warning has been flagged (see
Section 6).
6 Error Indicators and Warnings
If on entry
${\mathbf{IFAIL}}={\mathbf{0}}$ or
${{\mathbf{1}}}$, explanatory error messages are output on the current error message unit (as defined by
X04AAF).
Note: E02GCF may return useful information for one or more of the following detected errors or warnings.
Errors or warnings detected by the routine:
 ${\mathbf{IFAIL}}=1$
An optimal solution has been obtained but this may not be unique (perhaps simply because the matrix $A$ is not of full rank, i.e., ${\mathbf{IRANK}}<{\mathbf{N}}$).
 ${\mathbf{IFAIL}}=2$
The calculations have terminated prematurely due to rounding errors. Experiment with larger values of
TOL or try rescaling the columns of the matrix (see
Section 8).
 ${\mathbf{IFAIL}}=3$
On entry,  ${\mathbf{LDA}}<{\mathbf{N}}+3$, 
or  ${\mathbf{SDA}}<{\mathbf{M}}+1$, 
or  ${\mathbf{M}}<{\mathbf{N}}$, 
or  ${\mathbf{N}}<1$. 
7 Accuracy
Experience suggests that the computational accuracy of the solution $x$ is comparable with the accuracy that could be obtained by applying Gaussian elimination with partial pivoting to the $n+1$ equations which have residuals of largest absolute value. The accuracy therefore varies with the conditioning of the problem, but has been found generally very satisfactory in practice.
The effects of $m$ and $n$ on the time and on the number of iterations in the simplex method vary from problem to problem, but typically the number of iterations is a small multiple of $n$ and the total time is approximately proportional to $m{n}^{2}$.
It is recommended that, before the routine is entered, the columns of the matrix
$A$ are scaled so that the largest element in each column is of the order of unity. This should improve the conditioning of the matrix, and also enable the parameter
TOL to perform its correct function. The solution
$x$ obtained will then, of course, relate to the scaled form of the matrix. Thus if the scaling is such that, for each
$j=1,2,\dots ,n$, the elements of the
$j$th column are multiplied by the constant
${k}_{j}$, the element
${x}_{j}$ of the solution vector
$x$ must be multiplied by
${k}_{j}$ if it is desired to recover the solution corresponding to the original matrix
$A$.
9 Example
This example approximates a set of data by a curve of the form
where
$K$,
$L$ and
$M$ are unknown. Given values
${y}_{i}$ at
$5$ points
${t}_{i}$ we may form the overdetermined set of equations for
$K$,
$L$ and
$M$
E02GCF is used to solve these in the ${l}_{\infty}$ sense.
9.1 Program Text
Program Text (e02gcfe.f90)
9.2 Program Data
Program Data (e02gcfe.d)
9.3 Program Results
Program Results (e02gcfe.r)